Hezbollah sacrifices popularity for survival
In Syria, the Party of God is struggling for an un-divine victory
https://now.mmedia.me/lb/en/commentaryanalysis/hezbollah-sacrifices-popularity-for-survival
A dozen Hezbollah fighters were killed and over 20 injured in an ambush
Monday in Sayyida Zainab outside Damascus, Al-Arabiya reported Tuesday. The
station cited sources as saying that a number of the wounded were
transferred to the Rasul al-Azam Hospital in southern Beirut's Dahiyeh
suburb. Al-Arabiya's report added that when Hezbollah official Sheikh
Mohammad Yazbeck was offering condolences to a family of one of the
deceased, the dead fighter's mother asked him, "You told us your battle is
with Israel. Why did you send our children to die in Syria?"
That same night, a bomb was discovered in Beirut's Hay al-Sellom, a
predominantly Shiite neighborhood, with a message from Jabhat al-Nusra
directed at the Shiite group Hezbollah. A Hezbollah explosives expert
diffused the bomb and moved it to an unknown destination.
It is hard to believe that Jabhat al-Nusra would sign the bomb if they
wanted to hurt Hezbollah, even if it is only a matter of time before the
Front starts targeting Shiite areas in Lebanon. But for Hezbollah, the
timing couldn't be better. Raising fears of Jabhat al-Nusra within the
Shiite community is the only way for the Party of God to quell the
increasing fears resulting from military involvement of the Party in Syria.
It also helps in lobbying more fighters to join Hezbollah in Syria to defend
Shiite interests.
For Hezbollah, it is now a matter of survival. They are aware of their
declining popularity. A number of Hezbollah fighters have refused to go to
Syria and some have actually defected. More Shiites are converting to Sunni
Islam in order to pursue a normal life outside Lebanon. Getting a working
visa for Gulf countries is becoming impossible if you're a Lebanese Shiite,
so the sectarian identity that Hezbollah highlighted in their rhetoric for
the past two decades is now being sacrificed by many young Shiites for the
sake of financial security. Life seems to beat all ideologies and
identities.
But for Hezbollah, this is not an issue that would change or stop their
involvement in Syria. The party is an Iranian creation and will certainly
follow Iran's orders everywhere. And if Iran decides that Syria is the
battleground now, then Hezbollah will do whatever it takes to win there,
even if it costs them their popular Shiite base.
For Iran, this is a matter of survival, not power. The region is changing
and the old games are no longer working. The plan of being the main player
in the region is today jeopardized by the sudden rise of Islamists and
sectarian politics. The nuclear program is not enough and Syria is too
significant for Iran to lose. Therefore, Iran had to take charge and is now
calling the shots in Syria.
Reports coming from Syria on Iran's involvement indicate that Bashar
al-Assad is no longer in charge and that Iran is the real decision-maker,
mainly on strategic and military issues. Iran now seeks to turn the Syrian
revolution into a long-lasting sectarian war in order to protect its
strategic interests in the region.
Iran has not been sending Lebanese and Iraqi Shiite fighters to Syria in
order to protect the regime or the president; they know Assad is gone and
all they need now is to make sure they don't lose Syria after losing Assad.
Iran knows very well that the US will not get militarily involved in Syria
or in the Middle East in general. They know that the fight is now with
extreme Islamists supported by the Gulf countries and that the sectarian
fight is now spreading to the whole region, but that's not the problem. On
the contrary, Iran's involvement in Syria was a decision that took all these
consequences into consideration.
Today, Iran and Hezbollah understand these regional challenges and they are
changing their strategies to take advantage of them; that is, to exert more
control in the region through sectarian clashes instead of diplomacy.
Therefore, it is not important if Hezbollah is losing popularity at home
because of its military involvement in Syria; in fact, Hezbollah has been
transformed from a resistance movement and political party to a military
Shiite militia fighting Sunnis in Syria. It doesn't matter that all the
Shiites in the region will have to pay the price for that. Hezbollah has
sacrificed popularity for survival.
Hezbollah is fighting under the Abu El Fadl Al Abbas brigade in Damascus,
and it has also spread from Qusayr in Lebanon's Bekaa Valley to some areas
in Homs, which has become a very significant and strategic area for Iran
because it links Lebanon - and Damascus - to the Alawite coast. Homs could
seriously alter the balance of power.
However, the Iranian investment in Syria is not about an Alawite state to
protect Assad and the Alawites. It is more about an Iranian presence in
Syria to protect Iran in the region. Syrian opposition figures who preferred
to stay anonymous told NOW that the operation that targeted Assad's inner
circle, or what was known as the "Crisis Cell" in Damascus on July 18, 2012,
killing three high-rank officers, was actually planned and executed by
Iran's revolutionary guards, in an attempt to get rid of the Syrian decision
makers and gain more control over military and security decision.
The plan is to take over Syria, not protect the regime. However, with the
increasing military gains of Islamists groups and the radicalization of the
rebels, Iran and Hezbollah's plan hasn't been successful as they envisioned.
The city of Homs hasn't fallen into Iran's hands. There is no divine victory
here.
The problem is that the longer the fight goes on, the more sectarian it will
become. Hezbollah will find itself fighting in a territory that is gradually
changing to a Sunni Islamic space. This will not spare Lebanon, as a
sectarian war over the Umma will only mean that the Shiites in the whole
region will become victims of another divine war, this time a Sunni one.
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
No comments:
Post a Comment