Amateur Fanatics
By Raffaello Pantucci
Posted: April 10, 2013 in Jane's
http://raffaellopantucci.com/2013/04/10/amateur-fanatics/
Finally posting my longer piece for Jane's about the Birmingham plotters who
were convicted last month. I have already done a piece for my new
institutional home RUSI on this plot, and in the fullness of time will
probably do more as it is a group with interesting links. Unrelated to this
plot, but on terrorism more generally, I did interviews with Aftenposten on
Anjem Choudary in Norway, Die Volkskrandt on Europeans going to Syria and
the Toronto Star about converts in the wake of the news about the Canadians
linked to the In Amenas incident. Thanks to IHS Janes for agreeing to let me
republish this.
........................................................................
Amateur Fanatics
Key Points
Three men were convicted of plotting to carry out suicide attacks by a
court in London on 21 February.
The three were ringleaders of a wider cell; six other members have
pleaded guilty to terrorism offences, while three others face trial later
this year.
While elements of the plot were amateurish, cell members connected with
Al-Qaeda personnel in Pakistan for training and were intent on a
mass-casualty operation.
The trial and conviction of three men in the UK unveiled an Al-Qaeda-linked
plot to carry out a series of suicide attacks in Birmingham. Raffaello
Pantucci investigates.
"You know this operation they've done though, did it go a bit wrong or
something or what? It didn't do that much damage." Referring to the 7 July
2005 London bombings that killed 52 people, the conversation recorded by
police officers on 18 September 2011 conveyed the ambition of Irfan Khalid,
27, Irfan Naseer, 31, and Ashik Ali, 27. These three men were found guilty
on 21 February of plotting to carry out suicide attacks in the UK city of
Birmingham.
At their trial, the prosecution argued that the three had trained and
communicated with Al-Qaeda militants in Pakistan and were directed to carry
out a terrorist attack in Europe. The foiled plot was a seeming return to an
earlier period when UK counter-terrorism was almost singly focused on the
connection between the UK and Pakistan. There was a strong reason for this,
as major attacks disrupted by UK authorities in 2004, 2005, and 2006 - let
alone the July 2005 attacks - were all driven by plotters drawn from the UK
South Asian community who had connected directly with Al-Qaeda personnel in
Pakistan.
After 2006, the intensity of the threat from this South Asian link
diminished, although by no means went away, with threats from different
addresses rising up security agencies' list of concerns. As such, there was
a measure of surprise when, in September 2011, police officers in Birmingham
conducted a series of arrests and claimed to have disrupted a plot they
described as "Al-Qaeda linked" and at "an advanced stage of planning".
Following the conclusion of the trial almost 18 months later, the details of
the plot have emerged, with evidence indicating that the plotters had made
connections with Al-Qaeda, received explosives training in Pakistan, were
seeking to launch an attack in the UK, and had purportedly recorded
martyrdom videos that had been left behind with contacts in Al-Qaeda. The
weight of evidence was such that six individuals who were linked to the
three core ringleaders pleaded guilty to the charges against them. Four men
- Naweed Ali, 24; Ishaaq Hussain, 20; Khobaib Hussain, 20; and Shahid Khan,
20 - pleaded guilty to engaging in conduct in preparation for terrorism by
travelling to Pakistan for training. Known to police as "the travellers",
they were recruited by others in the cell to go to training camps in
Pakistan. Two other men - Rahin Ahmed, 28, and Mujahid Hussain, 21 - pleaded
guilty to fundraising for the cell.
The players
The leader of the cell was Irfan Naseer, known to the others as 'Big Irfan'.
During the trial, his lawyer described his client as an "overweight, lazy
mummy's boy" who was obsessed with "food and farting". Still living with his
parents, Naseer was the youngest of three sons born to a family that had
moved to the UK from Pakistan in 1975. He graduated from a Birmingham school
with sufficient qualifications to allow him to study for an undergraduate
pharmacy degree at Aston University.
He completed his degree in 2003, although by his own account one of the more
important things to happen during his studies was his rediscovery of Islam.
Claiming to have memorised the Quran when he was 19, Naseer told police that
during this time he also started to discover more radical Islamist clerics
and their ideology. On graduation, he failed to settle into working life,
dropping out of a work placement at a pharmacy in the Sparkhill area of
Birmingham. Instead, he took a series of jobs at religious institutions in
the area, including a stint from 2007-08 as a science teacher at the Darul
Uloom Islamic High School and College in Birmingham.
Naseer's deputy in the plot was Irfan Khalid, known as 'Little Irfan' to
distinguish him from Naseer. Born in the UK to a father from the disputed
region of Kashmir, Khalid was the oldest of three children who were raised
at his maternal grandparents' residence in the Sparkbrook area of
Birmingham. An underachiever, he attended Solihull College between 2001 and
2003, taking courses on information technology that he failed to complete.
In 2005, he travelled to Kashmir - staying with his paternal family - to
assist in aid efforts following the recent earthquake in the area. After
returning to the UK, at one point he worked as a security officer, although
the details are unclear. At the time of the plot, he was living with his
parents in Sparkbrook.
The third convicted plotter was Ashik Ali, a visually-impaired man who was
born in the UK to a father who lived with his two wives in Sparkbrook. Ali
underachieved at school, and performed poorly in his examinations. After
leaving school, his father helped him get a job in food processing, although
he left this job after nine months to work as a receptionist at a gym - one
of the many locations the cell members used to frequent. By September 2009,
he had enrolled on an Open University science foundation course, although he
subsequently failed to complete any of the course requirements.
Perhaps most salient regarding the plot, in February 2008 Ali married Salma
Kabal and the couple lived with Kabal's family while they waited to be
assigned council housing. In January 2011 they were given a one-bedroom flat
but, according to Ali, the relationship had ended by then and he elected to
move in by himself. In the narrative advanced during the trial, he purposely
split from Kabal in order to distance her from the plot and prevent her
being implicated. Instead, he seemed determined to use the flat as a
safe-house for the cell.
Around the three core cell members, there were a further nine people. In
addition to the six men who pleaded guilty to their involvement in the plot,
three others are due to face trial this year after pleading not guilty to
terrorism-related charges. Mohammed Rizwan, 33, and Bahader Ali (Ashik Ali's
brother), 29, face charges of supporting the cell in attack planning and
helping them recruit others, while Kabal, 23, faces charges of failing to
notify the authorities of what her supposedly estranged husband was planning
Going to train
When police first started investigating the cell in April 2011, Naseer and
Khalid were in Pakistan on their second trip seeking training. They both
first travelled to Pakistan in 2009, departing together from Birmingham
International Airport (BIA) on 24 March and returning separately in
mid-to-late November that year. Evidence subsequently indicated that while
they were in Pakistan they received money from fellow cell member Rahin
Ahmed, and the prosecution's assertion was that during this period Naseer
and Khalid spent time at a training camp. However, details of the nature of
the alleged training they received, or who they reportedly trained with,
were not made publicly available.
Just over a year later, on 26 December 2010, Naseer and Khalid made a second
trip to Pakistan, again allegedly to train, according to prosecutors. By
their own admission, the two were able to connect with the Pakistan-based
Kashmiri militant Islamist group Harakat-ul-Mujahideen (HuM). In a statement
on 17 September 2011 - which was recorded by UK authorities, used as
evidence in the trial, and is presented here unedited - Naseer stated: "We
had learnt our firing in Hurcut mujahideen [sic]. in a camp, that was inside
Pakistan though, that was one of the Hurcut camps, see you get the best
training there because the government doesn't attack them, because those
mujahideen say 'we're not going to attack Pakistani government' and they say
'ok you can send people [to] Kashmir and Afghanistan but don't do nothing
here'."
In an attempt to mask what they were talking about, Naseer and Khalid would
refer to the Waziristan region of Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal
Areas (FATA), where their training allegedly took place, as "W", with Naseer
recorded as telling Mohammed Rizwan on 17 September 2011: "'W' hasn't got no
more camps now. there's no camps, no training what they do, this is what
they do out here, you living in houses like this, yeah, because you know the
brothers use to be in the mountains. the brothers in the mountains the
drones [unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)] just get them straight away, they
just bomb the camps, so what they do is they stay, you know all this what
they taught us was inside houses."
Their activities at the camps seem to have been restrained due to pressure
from the use of UAVs by the United States over Pakistan's tribal region.
Naseer was recorded on 18 September describing the nature of the training:
"They keep [us] in a house like this, just these two rooms like that and a
toilet. And after being there like for two or three weeks and then move you
up to another place."
At a certain point, they were brought to a madrassah (religious school) in
Binori near the city of Karachi, where they were sent to classes to learn
about "J" [jihad], an experience that the men apparently did not enjoy.
Naseer was recorded telling Ashik Ali on 18 September 2011: "I was like
rolling around with pain and that in my stomach. [But] they still go, 'go
lesson'. So what it is - guess what we start doing? We go forget it man. If
these lot [sic] throw us out, they throw us out. We went upstairs and we got
wireless internet. So we were just watching 'J' videos all day. After Fajr
[dawn prayers] they used to come to our room. We used to be knocked out -
say we were ill. They would come up again. Then, they eventually got fed up
after two months and threw us out."
Who exactly trained the men is unclear, although in conversations recorded
by police the cell members referred to having received orders from the upper
reaches of Al-Qaeda and in particular Sheikh Khalid bin Abdul Rahman
al-Hussainan (alias Abu Zaid al-Kuwaiti), a senior figure in the group who
was reportedly killed in a US UAV missile strike in North Waziristan on 6
December 2012.
Naseer told Mohammed Rizwan: "You know him, he's in the top five of AQ after
Ayman al-Zawahiri. well you know the sheikh we're on about, the Kuwaiti guy,
you know about the top five. bro, there is no more proof than him saying it,
that, do it."
As with previous plots, the Al-Qaeda personnel allegedly training foreigners
in explosives seem focused on teaching innovative and original ways of
sourcing materials, evidently impressing Naseer. He was recorded on 17
September 2011 as stating: "They got such knowledge that, for example, in
this country, they know yeah, that, different, different place where you can
get, achieve like, for example, like, from [inaudible] where you can make a
bomb from [inaudible] yeah like, they make it easy for you."
One innovation of the plot was to use cold packs - used by athletes to
soothe injuries - as a source of ammonium nitrate for explosives. While at
one point Naseer was recorded assuring Ali that the packs contained the
necessary ingredients, the information was faulty as cold packs have been
manufactured without ammonium nitrate for several years for safety reasons.
Nevertheless, they continued to search for other methods of obtaining the
necessary materials.
Recruitment and fundraising
One of the clear messages that Naseer and Khalid allegedly received from
their contacts during training in Pakistan was to disseminate the message
and training further. Naseer was recorded on 17 September 2011, stating:
"They said yeah, the knowledge they gave us, they want that to spread in
Europe." They successfully persuaded the four-man group, referred to by
police as "the travellers", to go to Pakistan for training and aimed to
persuade Mohammed Rizwan to do the same. While this was ultimately
unsuccessful, Rizwan still faces charges related to his alleged involvement
with the cell and in particular providing support and encouragement in the
planned operation.
Among those who pleaded guilty, Ahmed, the self-described "taxi driver" of
the group, was tasked with multiplying the cell's money through online
foreign exchange trading. The seed money that he used in this enterprise was
obtained by the cell through a series of fake charitable drives that they
undertook on Birmingham's streets, claiming to raise money for UK-based
charity Muslim Aid and the local Madrassah-e-Ashraful Uloom. Using official
green Muslim Aid T-shirts and high visibility tabards, the group carried
green Muslim Aid-labelled buckets around Birmingham and briefly Leicester,
and had leaflets and other merchandise from the organisation to make them
seem credible.
This material was obtained by a cell member who volunteered for Muslim Aid,
but there is no suggestion that the charity supported or was aware of the
cell's fundraising efforts. Indeed, a statement released by Muslim Aid
following the conviction of Naseer, Khalid, and Ali on 21 February read: "We
welcome the conviction and sentencing of the individuals who. used our name
and property to collect funds illegally for their intended criminal
activity. A volunteer of the charity who pleaded guilty at an earlier
hearing assisted these individuals and abused the name of Muslim Aid without
our knowledge."
Having collected around GBP14,000 (USD21,000), Ahmed reportedly stated that
there was a "next to impossible chance of losing the money". However, his
optimism was misplaced. Between 17 August and 16 September 2010, he managed
to lose around GBP9,000. Of that amount, GBP 3,000 was lost when he left his
computer to make a cup of tea, missing a key market shift. This led the
others to distrust Ahmed and to cut him out of some elements of the plot.
They castigated him and told him that he would have to sell his car and take
out loans that he did not intend to repay to cover the losses.
Influences and targets
There is seemingly little doubt about the cell's contact with Al-Qaeda
personnel in Pakistan, and Naseer and Khalid appear to have at least
somewhat adopted the group's ideology. During a conversation with Rizwan as
part of his effort to persuade him to join the cell, Naseer was recorded on
17 September 2011 describing what he said in the martyrdom video that he
left behind in Pakistan: "It was Sheikh Osama [bin Laden] who we mentioned,
and the torture of [the] Muslim people." Khalid was also recorded as
stating: "Don't you think you can mess with the Muslims, don't you think you
can mess with the Muslims and get away with it because we're coming to your
house."
What is less certain is what they were intending to do in terms of the
attack in the UK. In a conversation on 17 September 2011, which was recorded
by police, members of the cell discussed using poison creams, something that
they had been taught by their Al-Qaeda trainers. They stated: "He goes that
like make it and put it inside like, you know like Vaseline or cream like
that, like Nivea cream and put it on people's cars, you know like the door
handles on a whole, imagine putting it on [the] whole like area overnight
and when they come in the morning to work they start touching the, they open
the door and then five minutes [later] they die man, all of them start dying
and that, kill about 1,000 people."
Although the main focus of the plot appeared to be the use of explosive
devices, the cell spoke of the possibility of using guns in some form of
attack, and were recorded by police on 17 September 2011 as stating: "Even
if you can't make a bomb, get guns yeah from the black geezers, Africans,
and charge into some like synagogue or charge into different places."
However, this, like many of the other plans, seemed largely fanciful. The
most likely one seemed to be collecting chemicals and testing out recipes to
establish the best way to build an explosive device from readily sourced
materials.
Indeed, when the three ringleaders were convicted on 21 February, the judge
told Naseer: "You were seeking to recruit a team of somewhere between six
and eight suicide bombers to carry out a spectacular bombing campaign, one
which would create an anniversary along the lines of 7/7 or 9/11 [the 11
September 2001 attacks on the US]." However, there was no indication at the
time of their arrest that the cell members had made any credible progress
towards producing a viable explosive device.
Concluding Lions
The sometimes amateurish nature of the plotters has led to them being
painted by the UK media as figures from the film satire Four Lions. Ahmed's
trading losses, alongside the news that Ali had eBay accounts named
TerrorShop and Shop Terror, all seemed to point to a rather clownish
operation.
However, this should not detract from the cell's genuine intent. Not only
were cell members able to connect with Al-Qaeda personnel, Naseer and Khalid
were able to attend training camps in Pakistan on at least two separate
occasions, raise substantial funds, dispatch another team of recruits to
Pakistan, and start to deploy their training back in the UK. When Khalid was
recorded by police, joking as he drove around Birmingham with a group of
fellow plotters, stating "it's the four suicide bombers driving around ready
to take on England, oh my God take them out", he was only half joking.
It was also notable that this vocal group of extremists was not reported
earlier to authorities by the local Muslim community. In particular, it was
highlighted that even though community members discovered "the travellers"
had been sent to a training camp, and forced Naseer to make sure they got
back safely, no one reported this to the authorities.
In retrospect, it is somewhat surprising that there was less awareness of
the cell. In their own recordings, they refer to interaction with radical
elements in Birmingham, and there are connections between the broader cell
and at least three separate terrorist investigations. It is difficult to
know if this was simply the background chatter visible in a tight-knit
community such as Birmingham's Sparkbrook and Sparkhill. Plots of varying
degrees of seriousness are periodically disrupted in this area of the
country, with at least one important trial expected later in the year. The
underlying lesson from this plot seems to be that terrorism in the UK
continues to have a strong Pakistani connection, something that has clearly
managed to outlive Bin Laden and the disaggregation of Al-Qaeda's senior
hierarchy.
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment