Brainless.
B
Downloading al-Qaeda terror guide 'will lead to arrest and prosecution'
Downloading Inspire has led to more than 20 prosecutions in Britain in the
past 18 months
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/crime/article3757618.ece
Sean O'Neill Crime and Security Editor
Last updated at 12:01AM, May 7 2013
Security agencies and police are adopting a zero-tolerance approach in
investigations into the distribution of al-Qaeda's online magazine Inspire
after its emergence as a common thread in a series of terrorism plots.
While it is virtually impossible to halt its distribution, intelligence
agencies and police are devoting more resources to tracking who is
downloading and accessing it.
Downloading Inspire has led to more than 20 people being arrested and
prosecuted in Britain in the past 18 months. The Boston Marathon bombers
also used the magazine's bombmaking instructions.
Many of those detained have been found to have studied the magazine's simple
guide - "How to make a bomb in the kitchen of your Mom" - and tried to put
them into practice. But a senior anti-terrorism police officer warned that
simply possessing Inspire - with its guides to making pipe bombs, pressure
cooker devices and crude firework and nail bombs - would lead to arrest and
charge.
"There is no question that Inspire has been operationally supportive to
terrorist plots," Assistant Chief Constable Marcus Beale, head of the West
Midlands counter-terrorism unit, said.
"If people are accessing it then there is a concern and a risk and we will
prosecute because we know the ideas and methods in the magazine are being
used. Section 58 of the Terrorism Act prohibits possession of something
useful to a terrorist so, irrespective of motive, in the UK people are being
convicted for having Inspire."
Ruksana Begum, 22, was jailed for a year last year for having the magazine
on a memory card despite the courts accepting that she was not involved in
terrorism and had accessed it to try to understand why her brothers had
become involved with a jihadi cell.
Mr Beale said the magazine had become increasingly influential among
would-be bombers. Irfan Nasser, jailed for life last month for plotting
suicide bombings to rival 7/7, used its bombmaking instructions, as did
members of another Birmingham gang who made nail bombs to attack an English
Defence League rally.
Terrorist suspects from London, Luton and other cities had also downloaded
the magazine, as had two men who arrived in Britain from Germany hoping to
find a contact who could send them to jihad overseas. It has also been found
in the possession of a youth who had no terrorism connections who was
arrested for plotting to blow up a school.
Mr Beale said: "Its influence derives from three factors. It is written in
English and doesn't depend on an understanding of Arabic, appealing directly
to Westerners. Secondly, it tries to look modern, glossy and attractive -
like a Western magazine. Yet it is still heavy with references to the
al-Qaeda narrative of events and religious texts."
There have been ten issues since July 2010. Produced by al-Qaeda in Yemen,
it is "landed" on selected jihadi websites and forums and spreads almost
uncontrollably from there. The magazine was initially produced by the US
radicals Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. After their deaths in a 2011 drone
strike, analysts say the quality of the English used in the magazine has
declined.
Mr Beale warned that the battle to halt the publication's spread and
influence would be hampered by the withdrawal of the Communications Data
Bill, which would have given police powers to collect information about the
internet communications of terror suspects.
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
No comments:
Post a Comment