Nigerian court convicts Iranian of illegal arms shipment
http://www.yourmiddleeast.com/news/nigerian-court-convicts-iranian-of-illegal-arms-shipment_15033
A Nigerian court on Monday sentenced an alleged member of the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard and his Nigerian accomplice to five years in jail each
over an illegal arms shipment.
Azim Aghajani and Nigerian Ali Abbas Jega were detained in 2010 when
authorities at a Lagos port discovered 13 containers of weapons that had
been declared as construction materials.
The case attracted wide international attention, in part because it raised
questions over whether Iran had violated United Nations sanctions on weapons
sales.
West African governments also warned that Iran may have been seeking to send
weapons to rebel groups in the region.
Federal High Court Judge Okechukwu Okeke pronounced the two "guilty as
charged" on four of five criminal counts, with the sentences for each count
to be served concurrently.
While the crimes in question carried a potential life sentence, the judge
said he was swayed by a plea for leniency from the defence and by the
conduct of the pair while in detention.
"In sentencing the accused I have taken into consideration the plea for
mercy by the defence team, but the law has to take its course," Okeke said.
The sentence will be counted retroactively from February 2011, when their
trial began, meaning the men will walk free in under three years.
Jiti Ogunye, a Lagos-based lawyer and commentator who followed the case,
told AFP he was "shocked" by the light jail terms, especially by the
decision to have the sentences served concurrently.
"Given how the case was going and the avalanche of evidence...everybody was
expecting a conviction with a heavy sentence," Ogunye said.
"It shows there is something very, very wrong with our criminal justice
system," he continued.
"When a verdict in any case falls short of the expected outcome, there are
bound to be worries...that something improper might have happened," he said.
He explained that Nigeria's judiciary has long been plagued by systemic
problems, including corruption and political pressures heavily influencing
verdicts, but he could not comment directly on the Iranian case before
reviewing the decision.
Aghajani has denied having links with Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard,
insisting he was a private businessman conducting a legitimate transaction.
The defence argued that the weapons were just passing through Nigeria and
were ultimately headed to the tiny nation of Gambia as part of a legal sale.
Gambia denied it was the intended recipient and cut diplomatic ties with
Iran over the dispute.
The case also sparked a stern response from Senegal, which accused Iran of
trying to deliver weapons to separatist rebels in its southern Casamance
region.
The United Nations added Aghajani to a blacklist last year, labelling him a
Revolutionary Guard member tied to "Iranian support for terrorism and
extremism worldwide".
The United States has also put Aghajani on its national sanctions list.
Addressing the court before his sentence was read out, the Iranian described
his time in Nigerian jails as "agony".
"It has been a very sad experience for me for three years," he said.
Judge Okeke denied a request by Aghajani's lawyer for the sentence to be
served in Iran.
Jega claimed he was told the cargo contained construction materials and said
he was hired by the Iranian as a middle-man to help clear the shipment
through the Nigerian port.
"I did not know what was there were arms. If I had known I would not have
waited to be arrested by the police," he said on Monday before sentencing.
"I ask for leniency."
The arms, which include heavy weaponry, are to be given to the Nigerian
government, the court ruled.
C AFP 2013
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
No comments:
Post a Comment