Why was our Ambassador in Benghazi?

The plot sickens as it thickens.  Why was Stevens at Benghazi?  The ambassador had to be there on the orders of the BHO regime.  He surely was sent there to recover private BHO/Hillary files of plans, communications or SOSUS information that must have been too (anti-American interests) sensitive for handling by any embassy or envoy personnel not part of the bho cabal.  What was so terribly important that the Ambassador personally made the dangerous trip to Benghazi to retrieve or destroy?  Will we ever know?

The SAM 9 type missile couldn't be the problem or could it?.  Why would the bho regime put hundreds of MANPAD type missiles into Libya with US flying aerial combat missions in support of the rebels?

What other idiotically selected weapons did we transfer to the radical OBL rebels?

What other bho appointee eyes-only information is out there?  CNN found Stevens Diary.  What other unburned pearls of intelligence are lying around in the consulate wreckage?  Is that why the FBI has not yet reached the consulate grounds to investigate this whole sordid debacle?  Keep them out until cabal agents pore over the scattered papers for cabal eyes-only information.

Mofak

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

Newsmax reports:

On Thursday, Corker and other Republicans lashed out at the administration for what they see as nothing short of a cover-up.

"This is turning into something not short of Benghazi-gate," Corker, R-Tenn., told Fox News, adding he's "very suspicious" about the way the administration has handled this.

Two senior officials told Fox that intelligence officials knew within 24 hours of the assault that it was a terrorist attack and suspected al-Qaida.

Isakson said Stevens' diary and other diplomatic cables are part of unraveling the mystery.

“He wrote that he thought he was the No. 1 target of al-Qaida, and he thought that his life was in danger,” Isakson said of Stevens, whose diary has since been published by news organizations. “If he wrote that in his diary, to me, it stands to reason he had already communicated that same information to the State Department.

“And if the State Department knew in advance of 9/11 that their ambassador thought he was in danger – and they did nothing to increase his protection or increase the defense of the embassy, then we have a terrible situation on our hands,” Isakson added. “I can’t understand the continued misinformation that continues to come from the administration over whether this was a terrorist attack or whether it was spontaneous? What did happen? What didn’t happen? And who knew what, when?

“The only way we can get to the facts is get the best possible evidence of that, and that’s copies of the cables between the U.S. State Department and the Benghazi Embassy in the latter days before the attack.”

Read more on Newsmax.com: Isakson to Newsmax: Obama Misled America on Libya Attack