Coverup more serious than Watergate...and there is SILENCE!

Subject: Uncovering Benghazi

 

I am very concerned about the recent attack in Benghazi that killed the ambassador and three others. I am also very concerned that due diligence is not being followed by most of the main stream media on following up on this serious event and trying to uncover the facts. This is supposed to be the job of the Press.

 

This is very serious and discerning. Watergate, which was much less serious, got more attention in a timely manner. In Benghazi, people died! Including TWO OFF DUTY NAVY SEALS!!!

 

As more information slowly seeps out, the Benghazi event takes on nuances that are very disturbing and should be immediately addressed by the Media and their reporters.

 

To date, information is slowly seeping out, mostly on FOX News, about the event; earlier attacks in Benghazi, earlier messages to the State Department raising concerns for safety and asking for increased security, the drone overhead during the 7 hour attack, numerous, emails the day of the attack to a plethora of security offices in Washington, including the White House, addressing the attack and pointing to terrorists, the ensuing two week commentary by the White House, State Department and UN ambassador that the attack was linked to the film on Muslims (including a speech two weeks later by the President at the UN blaming it on the film). It is now known that the film was not involved. What did actually happen, why did it happen and why the apparent cover-up for two weeks by the Administration?

 

This is very serious and discerning. Watergate, which was much less serious, got more attention in a timely manner. In Benghazi, people died!

 

As more information slowly seeps out, the Benghazi event takes on nuances that are very disturbing and should be immediately addressed by the Media.

 

I urge you to watch this video from Glenn Beck on the timelines associated with the attack on Benghazi and possible motives (not just 9/11). It claims that before the attack the ambassador was having dinner in that site with the General Council of Turkey. Why there in a very dangerous site? It was reported that the site was being watched and that the attack took place after the General Council left. Was there a connection on timing? Glenn Beck addresses past arming of Ansar al Sharia (who claimed responsibility for the attack on the embassy) by us when they were fighting Kaddafi. Glenn Beck addresses a link between this site and efforts to arm the Syrian rebels.

 

“The Hill” Oct 24 article about U.S. weapons in Syria addresses Russian claims that the Syrian rebels have received U.S. Stinger missiles through our ally, Turkey (the U.S. claims they are Russian missiles). The Turkish General Council had dinner with Ambassador Stevens in the Benghazi embassy hours before the attack. Conjecture or Reality?

 

Is this a Middle East “Fast and Furious” activity? Did it get out of  hand and thus the cover-up by the White House?

 

(http://www.video.theblaze.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=25445289&topic_id=&tcid=vpp_copy_25445289&v=3)

 http://beforeitsnews.com/terrorism/2012/10/beck-something-is-very-very-wrong-here-clare-lopez-ex-cia-officer-2444430.html 

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/263871-obama-administration-turns-the-tables-on-russian-claims-about-us-weapons-in-syria

 

 

"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil;  God will not hold us guiltless.

  Not to  speak is to speak.  Not to act is to act."  Dietrich Bonhoeffer

 

__._,_.___