Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Hezbollah's 1992 Attack in Argentina Is a Warning for Modern-Day Europe

 

 

Hezbollah's 1992 Attack in Argentina Is a Warning for Modern-Day Europe

Twenty-one years ago, a van blew up the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aries, and

few saw it coming. Here's how the EU can prevent similar tragedies.

Matthew Levitt Mar 19 2013, 1:15 PM ET

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/03/hezbollahs-1992-attack-in-argentina-is-a-warning-for-modern-day-europe/274160/

 

 

Around 2:45 p.m. on March 17, 1992, a Ford F-100 panel van drove down Arroyo

Street in tranquil neighborhood of Buenos Aries. It approached the front of

the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires--then drove up onto the sidewalk and

blew up. The explosion wreaked havoc up and down the street, destroying the

front of the building, causing the entire consulate building and part of the

attached embassy building to collapse. The 220 pounds of high explosives and

shrapnel, concentrated in the back right section of the vehicle, left

twenty-three people dead and another 242 injured. Most of the people killed

and injured were in the embassy but some were pedestrians, including a

priest from the Roman Catholic Church across the street and children at a

nearby school.

 

Hezbollah's most recent international terrorist plots targeted Bulgaria and

Cyprus, EU member states on the continent's eastern periphery, prompting

debate over designating Hezbollah as a terrorist group at the EU. For those

European leaders who remain undecided, this week provides a timely reminder

of what happens when the international community fails to respond to

Hezbollah terrorism.

 

    The 21st anniversary of the bombing provides a timely reminder of what

happens when the international community fails to respond to Hezbollah's

terrorism.

 

This week marks the 21st anniversary of the 1992 Israeli embassy bombing.

Failure to respond to that attack emboldened Hezbollah, which incurred no

cost for the attack. Two years later Hezbollah struck again, this time

escalating from a diplomatic to civilian target and blowing up the AMIA

Jewish community center in Buenos Aires.

 

Yaacov Perry, former director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet),

visited Argentina just a week before the embassy bombing for liaison

meetings with his intelligence counterparts. At a polo match and luncheon,

the intelligence chiefs discussed "the menace posed by terrorists," though

neither had any idea how close the menace was or how soon it would be

realized. Within days, Israeli counterterrorism teams would be back in

Buenos Aires investigating the embassy bombing alongside Argentinean and

American law enforcement and intelligence experts. An American International

Response Team, including U.S. explosives experts, deployed to the site of

the bombing and determined the type of explosive used by examining the

charred remnants of the car bomb. Within hours of the bombing, investigators

found the front section of the vehicle's engine block in a garden below the

staircase of an apartment building down the street.

 

In time, investigators would determine that the Ford van had been parked at

a parking lot located just a couple of blocks from the Israeli embassy for

the hour and a half immediately preceding the bombing--to be precise, from

1:18 p.m. to 2:42 p.m., according to the stamp on the ticket. Three minutes

after the van's departure, the vehicle bomb exploded outside the embassy.

 

In its claim of responsibility, delivered to a Western news agency in

Beirut, Hezbollah's Islamic Jihad Organization declared "with all pride that

the operation of the martyr infant Hussein is one of our continuing strikes

against the criminal Israeli enemy in an open-ended war, which will not

cease until Israel is wiped out of existence." Hussein was the five-year-old

son of Hezbollah leader Abbas Moussawi, both of whom were killed in an

Israeli air strike on his car on February 16, 1992. Speaking at Moussawi's

funeral, Hezbollah leader Sheikh Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah warned that

"Israel will not escape vengeance. We have received the message that there

is no need to respond in an emotional fashion." Fadlallah assured his

listeners in another statement that "there would be much more violence and

much more blood would flow."

 

The CIA noted in a July 1992 intelligence report that Hezbollah held the

United States and Israel equally responsible for Moussawi's death and

threatened to target American interests in retaliation. According to the

CIA, this was no empty threat: "Hezbollah elements began planning a

retaliatory operation against U.S. interests in Lebanon shortly after

Moussawi's death." Hezbollah, the CIA reminded policymakers in a July 1992

report, had executed two successful attacks targeting U.S. interests in

Lebanon the previous year--firing missiles at the U.S. embassy on October

29, 1991, and destroying the administration building at the American

University of Beirut in a car bombing on November 8, 1991.

 

These plans never did materialize, perhaps because Hezbollah was supremely

focused on an attack it was planning well beyond Lebanon's borders. Just

eight days after the assassination, the vehicle used in the embassy bombing

was purchased in Buenos Aires by an individual with a Portuguese accent who

signed documents with a last name different from the one on his

identification. Three weeks later, the embassy was in ruins. The speed at

which the operation was executed is easier to understand, however, in light

of evidence that Iran decided to carry out an operation in Argentina well

before Moussawi was killed. Mohsen Rabbani--an Iranian operative based in

Buenos Aires who would play a key role in the bombing--spent ten months in

Iran from January to December 1991. According to Argentine prosecutor

Alberto Nisman, Hezbollah used the Moussawi assassination to justify the

embassy bombing to its supporters, but the attack was carried out at the

behest of Tehran in response to Argentina's suspension of nuclear

cooperation with Iran.

 

Now, as then, the strategic relationship between Hezbollah and Iran is

resulting in a campaign of terrorism across the globe. Hezbollah seeks to

murder Israeli tourists, often targeting them in places frequented by

American and other tourists, while Iran has set its sights on Western

diplomats, including American, British, Israeli, Saudi and other officials.

Thankfully, the only successful attack to date was in Bulgaria, where a

Hezbollah bus bombing killed five Israelis and a Bulgarian. Two weeks

earlier, a Swedish Hezbollah operative was arrested in Cyprus, where he was

surveilling Israeli tourists boarding buses at the airport.

 

Hezbollah is watching Europe closely, much as it watched Argentina 21 years

ago this week. Argentina failed to respond to Hezbollah's challenge then,

and suffered the repercussions two years later. Europe has an opportunity

now to avoid that same mistake and should designate Hezbollah--in whole or

in part--a terrorist group for executing terrorist plots in Europe. History

suggests that failure to do so could result in still more attacks by an

emboldened Hezbollah.

 

==========================================

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this

message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to

these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed

within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with

"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.

The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The

Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain

permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials

if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,

teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria

for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies

as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four

criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is

determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not

substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use

copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you

must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS

PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment