A Short Recent History of Pressure Cooker Bombs
By Michael CrowleyApril 16, 20133 Comments
http://swampland.time.com/2013/04/16/a-short-history-of-pressure-cooker-bombs/
A member of a bomb disposal team holds onto a pressure cooker after a bomb
scare in Kathmandu June 9, 2011.
Authorities are now saying that the explosive devices in Boston were
fashioned from pressure cookers. (Yes, like the closed pot you might use to
cook rice at home.) As it happens, pressure cookers have a nefarious history
in counterterrorism circles. In 2004, the Department of Homeland Security
was concerned enough about pressure cooker bombs to issue an alert to
federal and state security officials: "A technique commonly taught in Afghan
terrorist training camps is the use/conversion of pressure cookers into
IEDs," the bulletin warned.
That bulletin cited several plots from 2002 to 2004 to use pressure cooker
bombs in France, India and Nepal. But more recently there have been at least
three other instances of would-be terrorists in the west, all of them
Islamic radicals, in possession of pressure cookers for reasons that seemed
not to involve having friends over for dinner. One was an Army private
linked to the 2010 Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan, who had reportedly been
taking bomb-making tips from the al Qaeda's short-lived (literally) magazine
Inspire and had various weapons and explosives along with his cooking pot.
(The magazine reportedly recommended pressure cookers as explosive
devices.) A 2010 suicide bomber in Stockholm had rigged a pressure cooker
bomb that failed to detonate. And as a newer DHS warning about the kitchen
devices noted, the failed 2010 SUV bomb in New York's Times Square was a
pressure cooker device featuring 120 firecrackers. The same DHS memo refers
to a March 2010 bombing with a pressure cooker at a western Christian aid
agency in Pakistan that killed six people.
Counterterror officials are surely well aware of these facts and studying
any leads that might link the device in Boston to Islamic radicals here or
abroad. But it's important to bear in mind that the ability to make these
bombs is hardly unique to al Qaeda and its sympathizers. Details on how to
make a pressure cooker bomb can also be found on websites associated with
anarchy and other forms of non-religious radicalism, including this one,
which describes how to build what is "affectionately known as a HELLHOUND."
Nor does building a pressure cooker bomb require much money or special
training. As DHS put it in 2004:
Typically, these bombs are made by placing TNT or other explosives in a
pressure cooker and attaching a blasting cap at the top of the pressure
cooker. The size of the blast depends on the size of the pressure cooker and
the amount of explosive placed inside.
Pressure cooker bombs are made with readily available materials and can
be as simple or as complex as the builder decides. These types of devices
can be initiated using simple electronic components including, but not
limited to, digital watches, garage door openers, cell phones or pagers. As
a common cooking utensil, the pressure cooker is often overlooked when
searching vehicles, residences or merchandise crossing the U.S. Borders
The identity of the Boston bomber or bombers remains very much unclear, and
it would be foolish to jump to conclusions. It would also be foolish to
ignore the twisted recent history of the pressure cooker as a method for
killing innocent people.
Read more:
http://swampland.time.com/2013/04/16/a-short-history-of-pressure-cooker-bomb
s/#ixzz2QeYJ4qfJ
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
No comments:
Post a Comment