Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Attacks Put Spotlight on Boston Counterterrorism Center

 

 

Attacks Put Spotlight on Boston Counterterrorism Center

http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2013/04/16/attacks-put-spotlight-on-boston-counterterrorism-center/

 

Boston's Regional Intelligence Center is poised to aid investigators as they

search for suspects in yesterday's bombing.

 

The center is one of America's 77 intelligence-sharing facilities, known as

fusion centers, that allow investigators to pool data from local, state and

federal sources. The state-run centers were funded by the Department of

Homeland Security in the years after 9/11 to address the lack of information

sharing among agencies, an issue cited as a factor in the government's

failure to prevent the 2001 attacks.

 

As investigators attempt to connect the dots in yesterday's attack, Boston's

fusion center will allow authorities to tap thousands of law enforcement

data sources, along with public data like information from credit agencies,

said Mike Sena, president of the National Fusion Center Association, and a

state commander of the Northern California Regional Intelligence Center.

"This is what fusion centers were built for," Mr. Sena said.

 

Boston's fusion center can help investigators scour for connections among

potential suspects, by mining hundreds of law enforcement sources around the

region, ranging from traffic violations, to jail records and criminal

histories, along with public data like property records, Mr. Sena said. As

the investigation widens, and investigators identify suspects, the system

can help lead authorities to co-conspirators. For example, the system could

flag a possible associate of the suspect by finding a past traffic ticket

issued to someone driving the perpetrator's car.

 

The system also allows local investigators to access the federal Homeland

Secure Data Network, giving screened personnel access to classified reports

from federal agencies like the Department of Homeland Security and the

Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mr. Sena said.

 

The fusion center system has its shortcomings, however. Despite their

strengths, fusion centers are hampered by the kinds of data silo issues that

are familiar to any CIO of a large company, according to Mr. Sena.

 

For example, while authorities can access an array of data sources from

their own state, data collected in fusion centers in other states cannot be

automatically accessed-that information needs to be requested and manually

uploaded. And interoperability issues that stem from a multiplicity of

proprietary search tools-as well as police record systems built by different

vendors-means even information from within California's 70 data systems,

often has to be reformatted before it can be pooled and analyzed, slowing

investigations, Mr. Sena said. And for security reasons, classified reports

from federal agencies cannot be accessed on the same machines, Mr. Sena

said. "Not being able to pull that data together is a huge problem," Mr.

Sena said. "When you are dealing with having to pull in information from 70

systems you can never be that speedy and time is of the essence with real

time crime support and investigation."

 

Last year, the Senate subcommittee on investigations released a report

questioning the effectiveness of the centers in fighting terrorism and

protecting privacy.

 

Still, without the fusion centers, investigators would need to physically

pull paper records from dozens of sources, and would need to obtain federal

reports through a lengthy request process, Mr. Sena said. "It gives

investigators access to an array of data they would not even know about

otherwise - it would be stovepiped away."

 

==========================================

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this

message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to

these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed

within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with

"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.

The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The

Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain

permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials

if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,

teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria

for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies

as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four

criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is

determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not

substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use

copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you

must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS

PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment