Canada train plot suspect traveled to Iran: U.S. officials

Iran + al-Qaeda terrorism.

 

B

 

 

Canada train plot suspect traveled to Iran: U.S. officials

http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE93O1D320130425

 

5:15pm EDT

 

By Mark Hosenball

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Investigators believe one of two suspects charged in

Canada with plotting to blow up a railroad track carrying passenger trains

traveled to Iran within the past two years, U.S. law enforcement and

national security officials said on Thursday.

 

Chiheb Esseghaier, a Tunisian-born doctoral student, traveled to Iran on a

trip that was directly relevant to the investigation of the alleged plot,

the officials said.

 

They declined to say precisely when Esseghaier, who appeared in court on

Wednesday in Toronto, had traveled to Iran, whether he had gone there more

than once, or whom he was in contact with while there.

 

When they announced the arrest of Esseghaier and his alleged co-conspirator,

Raed Jaser, this week, Canadian police said the two men had received

"direction and guidance" in the plot from "al Qaeda elements in Iran."

 

U.S. national security sources close to the investigation said that was a

reference to a network of low- to middle-level al Qaeda fixers and

"facilitators" based in the town of Zahedan, close to Iran's borders with

Afghanistan and Pakistan, that moves money and fighters through Iran to

support its activities in South Asia.

 

Canadian police say there is no sign of Iranian government involvement with

the suspects.

 

Neither Canadian nor U.S. officials have said precisely what interactions

they believe Esseghaier or his co-defendant engaged in with the alleged al

Qaeda network in Iran. Canadian officials have disclosed only minimal

details of the alleged Iran connection in public statements.

 

Esseghaier and Jaser were arrested on Monday after a joint Canada-U.S.

investigation that started last year, based on a tip from a member of the

Muslim community.

 

The pair are charged with plotting to derail a passenger train. U.S.

officials said the suspects discussed blowing up a trestle on the railway

line carrying daily Amtrak trains between Toronto and New York City shortly

before the train was scheduled to pass over the track, thus derailing it.

 

Esseghaier, 30, has been a doctoral student since 2010 at the INRS institute

near Montreal where he is researching the use of nanotechnology to detect

cancer and other diseases. In his court appearance, he disputed the

authority of Canadian law to judge him, saying the criminal code was not a

holy book.

 

The lawyer for Jaser, 35, said he denied the charges against him and would

fight them vigorously.

 

U.S. law enforcement and national security officials said U.S. and Canadian

agencies were investigating whether the suspects had accomplices in the

United States or Canada.

 

One official said there was "another shoe to drop" in the case. Canada's

National Post newspaper reported on Thursday that the FBI was holding a

third man in New York.

 

A spokesman for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police said his service was not

granting interviews about the case. The FBI did not immediately respond to

requests for comment.

 

(Additional reporting by David Ljunggren in Ottawa; Editing by Alistair Bell

and Peter Cooney)

 

==========================================

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this

message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to

these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed

within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with

"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.

The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The

Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain

permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials

if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,

teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria

for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies

as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four

criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is

determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not

substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use

copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you

must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS

PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.