Colo. suspect Evan Spencer Ebel slipped ankle bracelet
http://news.yahoo.com/apnewsbreak-colo-suspect-slipped-ankle-bracelet-191325585.html
By NICHOLAS RICCARDI | Associated Press - 1 hr 4 mins ago
DENVER (AP) - Parole officials did not realize that a white supremacist gang
member had slipped his ankle bracelet and fled custody until five days after
the system first flagged him as being delinquent, according to records
released Tuesday.
They sent a warrant out for his arrest the next day, one day before he was
killed in a shootout with Texas authorities and a day after police now say
they think he was involved in the slaying of Colorado prisons chief Tom
Clements.
"We have to do better in the future," said Tim Hand, director of the
Department of Correction's parole division.
Evan Spencer Ebel had been a model parolee until his electronic monitoring
bracelet stopped working March 14. Before that, he called in daily, even
once calling in alarm because no one had requested his weekly urinalysis
test to show he hadn't been using drugs.
His father provided him housing and a job at his law firm, but on the
afternoon of March 14, a "tamper alert" automatically went to a prison
computer system showing the bracelet had stopped working.
Two days later, corrections officials called Ebel and told him to come in to
repair the bracelet. He did not show up.
It was not until March 18 that parole officers spoke to Ebel's father, who
told them he feared his son had fled and gave them permission to search his
apartment. The next day, two parole officers saw Ebel had taken a large
amount of clothing and apparently fled.
That night, Clements was shot and killed as he answered the front door at
his house. The next morning, parole officers obtained a warrant for Ebel's
arrest for parole violations and sent it to Colorado State Patrol. They had
no indication he was involved in the Clements' killing until the shootout
March 21.
Ebel is also suspected of killing a Denver pizza delivery man and father of
three on March 17.
It's the latest break that Ebel seems to have caught as he spent nearly a
decade in Colorado's criminal justice system. Court officials on Monday
vowed to release procedures that led to a clerical error that allowed Ebel
to leave prison four years early.
Judicial officials acknowledged Monday that Ebel's previous felony
conviction was inaccurately recorded and his release in January was an
error.
In 2008, Ebel pleaded guilty in rural Fremont County to assaulting a prison
officer. In the plea deal, Ebel was to be sentenced to up to four additional
years in prison, to be served after he completed the eight-year sentence
that put him behind bars in 2005, according to a statement from Colorado's
11th Judicial District.
However, the judge didn't say the sentence was meant to be "consecutive," or
in addition to, Ebel's current one. So the court clerk recorded it as one to
be served "concurrently," or at the same time. That's the information that
went to the state prisons, the statement said.
So on Jan. 28, prisons officials saw that Ebel had finished his
court-ordered sentence and released him. They said they had no way of
knowing the plea deal was intended to keep Ebel behind bars for years
longer.
Two months later, Ebel was dead after a shootout with authorities in Texas.
The gun he used in the March 21 gunbattle was the same one used to shoot and
kill prisons chief Tom Clements two days earlier.
Police believe Ebel also was involved in the death of Nathan Leon, who was
killed March 17 after heading out to deliver a pizza.
"The Colorado Department of Corrections values its long-standing partnership
with the 11th Judicial District and the district attorney's office to
maintain order at the prisons in Canon City," Gov. John Hickenlooper's
spokeswoman Megan Castle said in a statement.
"We commend both the 11th Judicial District and the DOC for reviewing their
own internal processes and procedures."
Charles Barton, chief judge of the 11th Judicial District, and court
administrator Walter Blair, said in a statement that the court regrets the
oversight "and extends condolences to the families of Mr. Nathan Leon and
Mr. Tom Clements."
Leon's widow said the apology wasn't going to cut it.
"How do I tell my 4-year-olds, 'Daddy was murdered because of a clerical
error,'" Katherine Leon told KUSA-TV in Denver.
Leon's father-in-law told AP he had no immediate comment.
The attack that led to the plea deal took place in 2006. According to prison
and court records, Ebel slipped out of his handcuffs while being transferred
from a cell and punched a prison officer in the face. He bloodied the
officer's nose and finger, and threatened to kill the officer's family.
"If Mr. Ebel was prosecuted for an assault on an officer, it had to be
pretty severe, because in the course of day-to-day work, correctional
officers are regularly assaulted or threatened," said Pueblo County
Commissioner Buffie McFadyen, who is executive director of the correctional
officer group Corrections U.S.A.
"It sounds like a horrific oversight," she said of the mistake that led to
Ebel's release this year. "It's a tragic clerical error."
How often such errors happen is unknown. Examining court documents for
typographical and such errors would be a huge undertaking. The only thing
that comes close is case management efforts that ask questions such as, "can
we find the file," said Bill Raftery, an analyst at the Williamsburg,
Va.-based National Center for State Courts.
Ebel spent much of his time behind bars in solitary confinement and had a
long record of disciplinary violations. Records show he joined a white
supremacist prison gang.
Ebel's early release was just the latest twist in a case full of painful
ironies. His father is friends with Hickenlooper and had testified before
the Colorado Legislature about the damage solitary confinement did to his
son. Clements was worried about that very issue.
Hickenlooper raised the case with Clements when the governor hired him to
come to Colorado in 2011. The Democratic governor said he never mentioned
Ebel's name and the inmate received no special treatment.
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
No comments:
Post a Comment