As It Spied on Occupy Wall Street, Department of Homeland Security Fixated
on Media Coverage
By Pam Martens: April 3, 2013
Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly Inside the Surveillance Center in Lower
Manhattan. The Center Is Staffed Jointly By NYPD and Wall Street Employees
The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF) has released new documents it
obtained under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) filing with the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The documents show that DHS, the
sprawling Federal agency ostensibly created to combat terrorism after the
September 11 attacks, routinely spies on peaceful First Amendment activities
and required daily briefing on the extent of media attention being given to
Occupy Wall Street activities.
Media coverage both inside and outside of New York City was of concern to
DHS. On October 7, 2011, a special agent sent a memo to inquire about Kansas
City, asking: "Has there been any media attention given to the Occupy KC
protests?"
A DHS employee expressed concern in an October 27, 2011 memo that Federal
Protective Service personnel, a division of DHS, may have been caught on
camera, writing: "Was there media coverage of the events last night which
may show FPS involvement?"
As we previously reported, the Department of Homeland Security funded a
high-tech, joint spy center in the heart of Wall Street where
too-big-to-fail bank personnel work alongside NYPD officers to spy on the
activities of Occupy Wall Street protesters as well as law abiding citizens
on the streets. When the acclaimed CBS news program, 60 Minutes, became
aware of the joint spy center, it presented a fawning program on its
presence in lower Manhattan, neglecting to mention that Wall Street
personnel were bizarrely spying on citizens alongside law enforcement
personnel.
The new documents released by PCJF also show that DHS was interested in the
Occupy movement's ability to gain momentum through social media. In an
October 2011 memo, an agent wrote:
"A distinct feature of OWS is how it was born from online organization and
continues to use social media to spread its message, organize further
protests, and keep protesters connected. OWS and the broader Occupy Together
movement that organizes protests in other cities use services such as
Twitter, Tumblr, Meetup, and Facebook to this end, as well as having set up
a live video feed of the OWS encampment in New York. Announcements, videos,
and images are all collected and disseminated via these social networks as
well as on the OWS Web site."
Another memo notes:
"Social media and the organic emergence of online communities have driven
the rapid expansion of the OWS movement. In New York, OWS leaders have also
formed ad hoc committees to organize protesters and manage communications,
logistics, and security. The OWS encampment in Zucotti Park features a
medical station, distribution point for food and water, and a media center
complete with generators and wireless Internet. Organizers hold general
assembly meetings twice a day and a have established committees and working
groups including an Internet Working Group and a Direct Action Committee,
which plans protest activities and works to maintain peaceful and controlled
demonstrations. This high level of organization has allowed OWS to sustain
its operations, disseminate its message, and garner increasing levels of
support."
Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, Executive Director of PCJF, commented as follows on
the emerging pattern illustrated by the documents her organization is
unearthing:
"This production of documents, like the FBI documents that the PCJF received
in December 2012, is a window into the nationwide scope of DHS and FBI
surveillance, monitoring, and reporting on peaceful protestors organizing
with the Occupy movement. Taken together, the two sets of documents paint a
disturbing picture of federal law enforcement agencies using their vast
power in a systematic effort to surveil and disrupt peaceful demonstrations.
The federal agencies' actions were not because Occupy represented a
'terrorist threat' or a 'criminal threat' but rather because it posed a
significant grassroots political challenge to the status quo."
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment