The Caucasus "Simplified"

 

The Caucasus "Simplified"

http://fiercemountains.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-caucasus-simplified.html

 

So, now the Caucasus are in the news.

 

So much hyperbole, so much conjecture, so much "rush to be first" or

"breaking....." But don't worry. There will be folks who will break the

Caucasus down for us into bite sized pieces....

 

And they will all be wrong.

 

I can only do harm to the region by attempting to do what I am about to do,

but today seems to just scream for clarity in the wake of a very emotional

and tragic incident, so I'm going to jump in and "simplify" the Caucasus for

the newcomer.

 

First of all, the discord in the region goes back hundreds of years. You

have natives of the region fighting against occupation by the Russians. You

have tribes fighting each other. You have conflicts between various streams

of Islamic theologies.

 

Now, in addition to the above, you have residents of the Caucasus who are

NOT involved in the conflicts listed above but are being forced by a side

(pick a side) to PICK a side.

 

Then you have innocent bystanders who are enraged and filled with grief as

their family members are abducted by the various sides because they believe

that those family members are on "the other side." Abductions by FSB,

militia, insurgents, believers in the "correct" version of a theology.....

 

And then you have people who just simply want to be left alone, but have to

make decisions daily about who they are going to trust and interact with

just to get by........

 

The conflict has raged for so very, very long...... the conflicts of the 90s

are the greatest (closest) in Western memory, being the most recent, but

really only those with an interest in the region remember them. The horrors

of Beslan, the Dubrovka theater; these things are not common currency of

thought outside of the region and Russia, and the Kremlin has done its part

in downplaying the fact that the killing goes on almost daily, with a toll

that would shock outsiders if they really knew how many were dying......

 

The need for a scapegoat, a villian is visceral and completely

understandable. Having been born and raised in and around downtown Boston my

stomach lurched, I was enraged, and I myself wanted vengeance.

 

But I have also learned in my life that no answer is simple, although people

search for simple answers because complexities in the face of visceral

emotion is maddening and not as gratifying as a simple solution.

 

The caucasus: a region of absolute beauty, deep and rich culture, and yes,

turbulent conflict and tremendous amounts of bloodshed..... and much more

complicated than a simple answer.

 

Looking back at my intent at the beginning of this post to "simplify" the

Caucasus for the newcomer I can only feel as though I have failed at what I

set out to do, but hopefully you have come away with the understanding that

there IS no simple answer...... and to attempt to make a simple answer out

of a complex and disturbing incident such as the Bombings in Boston by

pointing to a region or a faith or an ideology will only cloud matters more

at a time when the fog of confusion and outrage lies thick upon us.

 

What else do I know about the connection between the bombers and the

Caucasus? Nothing, really. And I'm hoping that as time goes by we receive

accurate and timely information from our law enforcement agencies.

 

But what I DO know is that there is never a simple answer, no matter how

much we'd like for there to be one...... and any involvement with the

Caucasus that the bombers may have will not be simple either.

 

Hopefully I've simplified things for you!

 

==========================================

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this

message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to

these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed

within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with

"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.

The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The

Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain

permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials

if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,

teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria

for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies

as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four

criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is

determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not

substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use

copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you

must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS

PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.