Blacks Are The Hunters Not The Hunted
The shooting and subsequent death of Jordan Davis (read a black teen) by Michael Dunn (read an evil white racist) is being used by race-mongering marplots to stoke the fires under the caldron that teems with "white people are out to kill blacks."
One headline glared: "Black Parents Cannot Protect Their Children From America's Racism." Which is incoherent hyperbole, if not outright chthonic idiocy, when you consider that approximately 8,000 blacks are murdered by other blacks every year. And while I am getting ahead of myself, it is important to note that this fact is dismissed by intellectually dishonest black intelligentsia. It is dismissed because it is true; so rather than debate the truth, they choose instead to dismiss it.
There is no more transpicuous example of same than Ta-Nehisi Coates. Coates, staying true to form pursuant to my assertion, wrote: "The irrelevance of black life has been drilled into this country since its infancy, and shall not be extricated through the latest innovations in Negro Finishing School." He continued, "Spare us the invocations of 'black-on-black crime.' I will not respect the lie. I would rather be thought insane. The most mendacious phrase in the American language is 'black-on-black crime,' which is uttered as though the same hands that drew red lines around the ghettoes of Chicago are the same hands that drew red lines around the life of Jordan Davis…I will not respect the lie. I would rather be thought crazy." (On The Killing of Jordan Davis By Michael Dunn; 2/15/14) It is difficult to say if the lines of demarcation pursuant to insanity and reality actually meet in his world, but suffice to say she makes my point. If blacks cannot argue the facts, they dismiss them. His pernicious sophistry has transmogrified into theater of the macabre.
It is dismissed because it is true; so rather than debate the truth, they choose instead to dismiss it.
But as I wrote, not every black mind is as infectiously mutated as those blacks who hold to the philosophy of Coates, et al. For instance, Jerry Oliver, the Chief of Police in Richmond, Virginia in 2000, said, "Today it is not the Klan riding through our neighborhoods killing our [black] men and raping our women. It is our own [black] neighbors depriving us of our civil rights, and it is our own [black] leaders who seem preoccupied with blaming cops, the system and everyone else." (Did King Mean What They Now Say; 1/20/14)
As I wrote in my exclusive website feature Behind The Political Curtain, "Blacks are willingly oblivious to the reality of their actions but respond with reflexive victimology to another's. The willingness of many blacks to overlook the pandemic of systemic violence they perpetrate not just against one another but against anyone coming within the orbit of their spheres of locality is appalling. It is second only to their reflexive victimology." (Blacks Are Willingly Oblivious; mychal-massie.com; 2/17/14)
It is myopically paradoxical and a demonstrable lie for blacks to prostitute the idea of black parents not being able to protect their children from a renegade America where racist whites are permitted open season on them.
These race-pimps should be asking themselves what they can do to protect their children from the black hordes that are maiming, raping, and killing blacks right where they live. They should be asking what they can do to protect themselves from the black drug dealers and gang-bangers destroying their neighborhoods. Black intelligentsia like Coates can pretend to ignore the truth of black-on-black crime, but their denial doesn't make the reality any less true. In fact, a question these blacks should be required to answer is, how many blacks were injured, wounded, and/or killed by other blacks nationwide over the same weekend Davis was killed by a white person who may or may not have been in fear of his life?
Another very important question almost never raised is, who is going to protect innocent people, specifically white people, from black crime? Colin Flaherty has written over 100 featured articles for WND.com which chronicle hundreds if not thousands of attacks by blacks against whites. Why aren't we asking who is protecting whites and innocent blacks from the marauding black hoodlums? Who protected the white baseball player in Oklahoma who was killed "for fun" because they "wanted to see someone die"?
Who is to protect the hundreds of white people attacked by black hoodlums during Black History Month alone? (See: Black Violence Strikes From Baton Rouge To Brooklyn; Colin Flaherty; WND.com; 2/20/14)
The anecdotal instances of white-on-black crime are more synonymous with whites acting in self-defense than they are whites hunting blacks to do them harm. It is obdurate intellectual dishonesty on the highest order to purposefully confuse the two. Whites aren't hunting blacks; if they were we would hear about more than Michael Dunn and George Zimmerman.
And last, but certainly not least, who is protecting the black children who are at greater risk of being murdered in their mother's womb than they are in the ghetto? Or do not these black children not matter?